Recently I've read that the iconic mural at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, Deborah Whitehouse's Spirit of Atlanta, is being deinstalled after nearly 20 years in residence, to be replaced by a Porsche advertisement. The mural was installed in 1996 to commemorate the Summer Olympics in Atlanta. Though Spirit of Atlanta is not as cool as Leo Tanguma's ballsy murals at Denver International Airport (parts of which have also been deinstalled), I've always liked seeing this welcoming work of art as I headed up the escalator from the terminal trains below (well, everything except that diaper kid on the right; that kind of creeped me out).
Art to be replaced by an ad . . . no matter if you liked the mural or not, it certainly is better than yet another advertisement (visual pollution). Although art and advertisement share the same language, their motives are completely different things. Art aspires to truth. Ads, however, are no different than political propaganda, as they both have an ulterior agenda behind the facade. Since the 1960's (with Andy Warhol and Pop Art) and the advent of Postmodernism (with their expanded definition of what could be considered art) many have accepted advertisement as an art-form. I will proudly remain a stick-in-the-mud, however, and a misanthrope if I have to be, working outside of the cultural norms and in defiance of this trend. Nor will you find me a visitor to the High Museum of Art's Coco-Cola exhibit, either.
I can understand (but never agree with) how many people can be uncomfortable with Leo Tanguma's murals, In Peace and Harmony With Nature, and The Children of the World Dream of Peace; most people would choose ignorance and bliss over truth and consequence, but to favor an advertisement over art, as many have done in the comments section of the article I read, that I can not fathom. Take this gem from the comments section by a person identifying themselves as DrSocrates:
Finally the airport is making some sense. The airport is no place for artwork, museums, shopping malls, or fine dining. It is a place for travel. It could be a place for revenue-producing ads. There are many places for ads. Where the mural was, where you wait for the trains (think New York's subway), on the trains, at baggage claim. Whether these ads increase business for the sponsors doesn't matter. The airport should try to maximize its revenue generation so it can DECREASE taxes and fees. Period. End of argument.
What an obtuse ass. And it only gets uglier from there.
In case you were wondering about Leo Tanguma's murals at Denver International Airport, it seems they have become part of a conspiracy theory involving a secret underground base, the Illuminati, the New World Order, Neo-Nazis, and Subterranean Reptoid Aliens. I think we need more of this kind of art! You can learn more about it here: