31 Flavors of Bad Art: Art, Artists, and Art Movements That I Either Find Problematic or Just Outright Dislike.
1. Jean Honore-Fragonard – The Swing, 1767 . . . A fine example of Rococo art, in all its decadent decorativeness. It isn’t critical of anything and serves only to please the eye, and that, not very well. The ultimate in work inspired to produce in me a yawn.
2. Alexandre Cabanel – Birth of Venus, 1863. Like most late 19th Century Academic Salon work, it is backward looking and fails to take any stance on Modernity. At least it is interesting to look at, sometimes.
3. Kasimir Malevich – Black Square, 1915. Malevich was the founder of the Suprematist art movement. In Suprematism (Part II of The Non-Objective World), Malevich writes: Art no longer cares to serve the state and religion, it no longer wishes to illustrate the history of manners, it wants to have nothing further to do with the object, as such, and believes that it can exist, in and for itself, without "things" (that is, the "time-tested well-spring of life"). In his attempt to produce an art that no longer serves the state and religion, he also produced an art of negation, of life, of love, and of nature. Contemporary to Malevich, Neoplasticist artists such as Piet Mondrian also striped their work of anything human, by reducing their palette to primary colors, black and white, and limiting their composition to horizontal and vertical forms.
4. Marcel Duchamp and or Baroness Elsa von Freytag - Fountain, 1917. Submitted for the exhibition of the Society of Independent Artists in 1917, Fountain was rejected by the committee, even though the rules stated that all works would be accepted from artists who paid the fee. Duchamp, a failed painter, perhaps jealous of the success of his two brothers’ and sister’s success in the arts, might have created Fountain out of spite. He would come to reject all art that he considered “retinal,” that is all art that relies on notions of aesthetics and aims only to please the eye. Instead, Duchamp wanted to put art back into the service of the mind. I think Duchamp was mistaken in dividing art into two camps, art made only to please the eye and art that is purely conceptual. There are plenty of works of art that have grounding in both. Duchamp’s Readymades were purely conceptual, “My idea was to choose an object that wouldn't attract me, either by its beauty or by its ugliness. To find a point of indifference in my looking at it, you see.” In favoring the mundane and conceptual over aesthetics, Duchamp produced a black work that destroyed the primacy of the image.
5. Fortunato Depero - Patriotic Storm, 1924. Italian Futurism, an offshoot of Analytical Cubism, emphasized and glorified themes associated with contemporary concepts of the future, including speed, mechanization, technology, youth and violence, and objects such as the car, the aeroplane and the industrial city. It celebrates Fascism and many of the concepts that helped make the 20th Century such a violent and dehumanizing place.
6. Lucio Fontana – Concetto spaziale (Spatial Concept), or Tagli (Slashes), 1949. Like many of his works, it is a monochrome painting with sharp, precise slashes on the canvas, “to discover the space beyond”. Fontana founded Spatialism, a movement reminiscent of Futurism, which celebrated rather than criticized Modernity. Fontana’s slashed and empty canvases seem to be a violent challenge against individuality.
7. Yves Klein - The Specialization of Sensibility in the Raw Material State into Stabilized Pictorial Sensibility, The Void, 1958. An exhibition held at Iris Clert Gallery, it featured an empty room, painted white. Guests were served International Klein Blue colored cocktails. Critic Thomas McEvilley, in an essay for Artforum in 1982, classified Klein as an early, though enigmatic, postmodernist. Remember, postmodernism will not have anything to do with things enigmatic, favoring instead, the mundane. Klein’s inclusion, no doubt, has much to do with his favoring of concept over the primacy of the image.
8. Frank Stella – The Marriage of Reason and Squalor, 1959. Stella, an abstract post painterly minimalist, is heralded for creating abstract paintings that bear no pictorial illusions or psychological or metaphysical references. It is, in a sense, superficial abstract art for corporations. Unlike the abstract expressionist work before, there is no searching for something greater in the work; instead you are presented with a cold and indifferent face.
9. Andy Warhol - 32 Campbell’s Soup Cans, 1962. Warhol’s work celebrates rather than criticizes modernity’s excesses of superficiality, celebrity culture, commerciality, and the mundane. It is apolitical and devoid of emotional and social commentary. The work seems symptomatic rather than critical of the times.
10. Jospeh Kosuth - One and Three Chairs, 1965. A work that definitely demands a text for proper interpretation, it consists of a chair, a picture of the same chair in the gallery, and an enlarged photograph of a dictionary definition for chair.
11. Bruce Nauman - The True Artist Helps the World by Revealing Mystic Truths, 1967. The work consists of the enigmatic title text displayed in the language of pop culture, a spiral neon sign. It is meant to question what we perceive the role of the avant-garde artist to be in society. Is it a noble gesture or a mocking call? On the work Nauman says this: “The most difficult thing about the whole piece for me was the statement. It was a kind of test—like when you say something out loud to see if you believe it. Once written down, I could see that the statement [...] was on the one hand a totally silly idea and yet, on the other hand, I believed it. It's true and not true at the same time. It depends on how you interpret it and how seriously you take yourself. For me it's still a very strong thought.” If one is to consider how seriously he practiced what he preached, one need only to look at other works such as his photograph Self Portrait as a Fountain,1966, which shows the artist spouting a stream of water from his mouth, or his installation, Clown Torture, 1987. Nauman is also famous for saying, “If I was an artist and I was in the studio, then whatever I was doing in the studio must be art.” I could not disagree more. Fail.
12. Donald Judd – Untitled, 1971. This work consists of six large, blue cubes lined up in a row. It is cool, empty, detached, signifying nothing. Judd might say that is the point, and to that I would say, you are a sad, sad man.
13. Sol LeWitt - Wall Drawing #118, 1971 – Considered a founder of both minimalism and conceptual art, Sol Le Witt sought to destroy the notions of the artist author and as a champion of individuality. Wall Drawing #118 consisted of a set of instructions for School of the Museum of Fine Arts Boston students to make a drawing on a wall. Not only did the work require other people’s hands, the set of instructions dictated that elements of randomness and chance be the guiding force necessary for execution. I am not opposed to the use of chance in art. Relinquishing some control in the art making process can produce interesting results, but to produce art that is totally dependent on chance, I do not believe that one can properly claim to be author of the results (assuming the results are even aesthetically valid).
14. Vito Acconci - Seedbed, 1971. For two weeks in 1971, Vito Acconci laid below a ramp inside Sonnabend Gallery and jerked off while continually uttering his sexual fantasies about the visitors walking above him, which were broadcast through loudspeakers. I am not shocked or disturbed by his actions; rather, I find myself asking, what is the point? Aesthetics are certainly absent, so some sort of concept must be at work. In an interview with The Believer, Acconci tells us the genesis of Seedbed: “I wanted to be somewhere where I blended with the space . . . Under the floor seemed to be the most fertile, because I could move under the floor . . . But it still wasn’t clear to me at all what I would be doing there . . . So I’m stuck, and Roget’s Thesaurus sometimes is a kind of guide because it takes you from one word to another word that you might not have even known you were looking for. It’s—I don’t know if I can say it’s an idea-structuring system, but it’s an idea-loosening system. So I look up floor. Floor took me to expected words like structure, land, undercurrent. And then took me to the word, seedbed. Seedbed then clarified it that, OK, under the floor I could be making this seedbed, this bed of seed. How do I make the bed of seed? By masturbating.” Essentially, then, Seedbed is about word play, not gender politic, not redefining the line between art and pornography, and not even about the precarious relationship between artist and art patron. Fail.
15. Sherrie Levine – After Walker Evans, 1980. Levine’s work uses appropriation to raise questions of authenticity and commodification. She deconstructs Modernism. For After Walker Evans she re-photographed Walker Evans’ photographs, reproduced in an exhibit catalog. Levine’s work does little to transcend Modernism, which she is obviously critical of, but rather works to belittle it, in order to make her look better by comparison. She is a parasite. Other artists she has deconstructed include Egon Schiele, Van Gogh, Degas, Cezanne, Miro, Mondrian, Monet, and Kirchner.
16. Tom Blackwell – Herald Square, 1983. While it is possible to appreciate the realist aesthetic and the skill that goes into producing such works, it does nothing to comment on contemporary culture. Photorealism, like Pop Art, champions the modern mundane. Even supposing that it is a mirror held up to society, most mirrors are ineffective as a commentary. They only flatter the subject. Still, unlike a lot of Post-modern art, Photorealism technical proficiency is at least a labor of love.
17. Jeff Koons – Two Ball 50/50 Tank (Spalding Dr. J Silver Series, Spalding Dr. J. 241 Series), 1985. The work consists of two basketballs floating in an aquarium. That is it. This particular work was my introduction to Post-modern art when I saw it at the Georgia Museum of Art in the summer of 1999. I have been trying to understand ever since. Perhaps there is nothing to understand. Koons’ most famous piece, arguably, is his life-size gold leaf accented porcelain rendition of Michael Jackson and Bubbles, 1988. Like Warhol, Koons' apolitical work champions pop culture. His work, by his own admition, contains no hidden meanings or critiques.
18. Tehching Hsieh - One Year Performance 1985–1986 (No Art Piece), 1985 - 1986. For one year, Hsieh did no art, spoke no art, saw no art, read no art, and did not enter any museum or gallery. This is a paradox. If Hsieh did not create art for one year, then how can the investigation or result be considered art? Hsieh is famous for his one year long endurance performances. Other performances include voluntary incarceration, One Year Performance 1978–1979 (Cage Piece), where he was confined in a cell. He was not allowed to talk, to read, to write, or to listen to radio and TV. In Art / Life: One Year Performance 1983-1984 (Rope Piece), he was tied to another artist, Linda Montano, for a year, with an 8-foot-long rope. They were not allowed to touch each other until the end of the one year period. In yet another performance, One Year Performance 1981–1982 (Outdoor Piece), he had to avoid shelter of any kind for a year (buildings, cars, airplanes, tents, etc). While it is arguable that these at least have some merit as art as sociological experiment, his (No Art Piece) definitely falls flat.
19. Andres Serrano – Immersion (Piss Christ), 1987. Perhaps you’ve heard of this one. It is a photograph of Jesus on a crucifix suspended in a jar full of urine. Despite some apologetic interpretations, aesthetics is not the issue here. If aesthetics were the issue, then any number of alternative substances of similar appearance could have been used (amber, polyurethane), and Serrano would not have referenced to the use of urine in the title. It might be suggested that Serrano was actively courting controversy, which is reverse pandering, shock for shock’s sake art. Serrano, however, has gone on record as saying the art is a relativist concept, meant to provoke questions of what he perceives as a cheapening of Christian icons in contemporary culture. This is in line with Sister Wendy Beckett’s interpretation, which is that it is a reflection of what contemporary culture has done with Christ and his teachings. I still contend, however, that if Serrano truly respected the value and power of symbols, he would not have disrespected the icon. Serrano’s argument, then, exposes him as a hypocrite.
20. Rirkrit Tiravanija – pad thai, 1990. In this work, and in several others following, Tiravanija takes over a gallery, prepares food, and shares it with gallery visitors. Art historian Rochelle Steiner says of Tiravanija’s work, it “is fundamentally about bringing people together.” I do not see how changing the context, from kitchen to a gallery, makes this art. If all Tiravanija wanted was to bring people together in a gallery, wouldn’t a proper exhibit of art produce the same results? And concerning Tiravanija’s obsession with sharing food, I believe the world would be better served if he instead volunteered his time in a soup kitchen for the homeless.
21. Damien Hirst – Untitled (With BlackDot), 1988. There are over a thousand variations of similar, spotted works, created by Hirst and his army of assistants. All trace of human intervention is removed until the finished product appears to be constructed mechanically. Lacking in anything resembling authenticity, Hirst’s paintings can only be enjoyed ironically. As Jonathan Jones writes in his article for The Guardian, “They are paintings to show off at cocktail parties; paintings to decorate PR company offices: paintings to snort coke in front of.”
22. Paul McCarthy, Painter, 1995. This video performance piece mocks the modern myth of the painter as a great hero. While I like that he uses humor to challenge bourgeoisie mores in his other work, notably their uncomfortably with sex, (his publicly displayed Christmas themed works bear an uncanny resemblance to butt-plugs), I did not care for how he turned the notion of modernist painting as something sacred into something to be ridiculed. Without any sign of idealism, McCarthy’s critique and art becomes hollow, and the artist reduced to being nothing more than a nihilist clown.
23. Chris Ofili – The Holy Virgin Mary, 1996. Another shock for shock’s sake piece along the lines of Serrano’s Piss Christ, Ofili’s work pictures the Virgin Mary painted with elephant dung and collaged with pornographic elements. I truly doubt Ofili’s sincerity when he said the work shouldn’t offend, that the work is only meant to be experienced aethetically. If the work mocked Buddhism, Islam, or Judaism, however, I would hypothesize that the art world would not be so forgiving. Ofili was also in another controversy in 2005. While serving as a trustee on the board for the Tate Gallery, Ofili brokered the sale of his The Upper Room for over a million dollars to the gallery, all while the gallery presented itself as being in trouble and solicited, with Ofili’s help, donations of free work from other artists. Notably, a collection of Stuckist work valued at over $500,000 dollars was rejected.
24. Tracy Ermin – My Bed, 1998. A disheveled bed, everyday bedroom objects and detritus, and condoms. It is literally the artist’s bed moved into a gallery setting. There is no commentary, no craft, and no concept, other than the artist’s own narcissism for her to assume that the mundane aspects of her personal life were of any interest to the public.
25. Marco Evaristti, Ice Cube Project, 2004. Brought to you from the artist who created Helena, 2000 (the live goldfish in the blender) Ice Cube Project is Evaristti’s attempt to cover an iceberg off the coast of Greenland in red paint. Of the work he says,“We all have a need to decorate Mother Nature because it belongs to all us. This is my iceberg; it belongs to me.” We are forced to decide whether the work is sacrilegious or ironic statement. Even if one takes the statement ironically, and we read the work as a critique on environmental destruction, we are left with the artist’s actual work being hypocritical.
26. Jacob Collins, Red Head, 2004. A fine example of Classical Realism, Classical Realism seeks a return to classical ideals of beauty; it champions the production of art reminiscent of late 19th century Academic Salon work, although some elements of Impressionism have also been incorporated. It is backward looking, idealism for the past without much concern for the future. While it is possible to appreciate the skill that goes into producing such works and to admire the beautiful work that results, it does little to comment on contemporary culture. It failed to do so in the late 19th Century and it fails to do so now. Still, there are at least some things redeeming in the work; it is at least a loving quest to discover beauty, and there is something noble in that.
27. Martin Creed, Being Sick (Work No. 547), 2006. There is nothing noble here. Being Sick is a video loop of close ups of 19 different people vomiting. Creed won the Turner Prize in 2001 for Work No. 227, an empty room where the light goes on and off at five second intervals. There is nothing here, no commentary or concept other than pure nihilism.
28. Nathan Coley - There will be No Miracles Here, 2006. A sad but challenging work, it is a large illuminated sign spelling out the phrase named in the title. Ironically, the text piece depends on text in order to get to the concept. The work refers to an obscure event that took place in the French town Modseine in the 17th century. So many miracles were reported in the town that finally the message “there will be no more miracles here, by order of the King” was sent in order to keep things under control. I would have preferred that the sign was meant to be a wake up call to artists, to produce in them the desire to once again make miracles, but this is not Coley’s M.O. In interviews, Coley, like many other Post-modernists, seems a bit of a skeptic. I believe we have to take the sign at face value and figure that Coley would believe that miracles in art are no longer possible. There will be No Miracles Here won the Turner Prize in 2007.
29. Aliza Shvarts – Untitled (Abortion Art), 2008. In 2008 Yale undergraduate gained fleeting prominence for a year long performance where she documented her repeated artificial inseminating of herself, and then repeated self-induced miscarriages. She described her efforts in typical postmodernist opaque language: ‘This piece – in its textual and sculptural forms – is meant to call into question the relationship between form and function as they converge on the body. The artwork exists as the verbal narrative you see above, as an installation that will take place in Green Hall, as a time-based performance, as a [sic] independent concept, as a myth and as a public discourse . . . It creates an ambiguity that isolates the locus of ontology to an act of readership.’ Abortion ethics debate aside, Shvarts’ work naively makes light of the emotional difficulties that a woman would experience in the course of an induced or natural miscarriage. There is nothing else naïve about the work, however. It might be cynical of me, but I believe the work was nothing but a publicity stunt to jump-start her career in the arts.
30. Pedro Campos - Hot Day III, 2008. Hot Day III is an example of Hyperrealism, Photorealism’s more recent offshoot. Most Hyperrealist work continues Photoralism’s tend of promoting the mundane and banal in art, although there is some hope in the work of artists such as Gottfried Helnwein. Helnwein uses Hyperrealist technique to produce work that is both humanist and a social critique. A decent example of his art can be seen in Downtown 20, 2002.
31. Marni Kotak – The Birth of Baby X, 2011. And I thought there was nothing more narcissistic than Tracey Ermin’s work. In The Birth of Baby X, Kotak gives birth to a child in a gallery, re-contextualizing her life/art. Before this, the artist often took events in her life and recreated them as art. Ever since then, she has exploited her son, Ajax, as part of her ongoing performances of Raising Baby X.